🔗 Share this article

The group describe themselves as the "salvage squad". After their sudden termination when foreign assistance was slashed earlier this year, a group of dedicated professionals opted to establish their own support program.

Refusing to "wallow in misery", Rob Rosenbaum, along with similarly motivated former agency staff, began endeavors to preserve some of the crucial programmes that were at risk after the funding decreases.

At present, almost 80 programmes have been rescued by a connector platform operated by the leader and fellow past team members, which has secured them more than $110 million in fresh financial support. The group behind the resource optimization project effort projects it will help forty million people, including many children under five.

After the office shutdown, spending was frozen, a large workforce was let go, and global initiatives either ended suddenly or were barely continuing toward what Rosenbaum describes as "final deadlines".

Rosenbaum and some of his colleagues were approached by a foundation that "wanted to understand how they could make the best use of their constrained funds".

They created a selection from the terminated programmes, identifying those "delivering the most critical assistance per dollar" and where a fresh backer could feasibly get involved and continue the work.

They soon realised the requirement was more extensive than that initial foundation and started to approach other potential donors.

"We referred to ourselves as the lifeboat crew at the beginning," explains the leader. "The vessel has been sinking, and there aren't enough emergency options for every project to be saved, and so we're striving to literally protect as many infants as we can, secure spots for these rescue options as possible, via the programmes that are providing support."

Pro, now functioning as part of a global development thinktank, has garnered backing for numerous programmes on its list in in excess of 30 regions. Several have had initial backing returned. Nine were unable to be rescued in time.

Financial support has come from a mix of charitable organizations and private benefactors. The majority prefer to stay unnamed.

"The supporters originate from diverse backgrounds and opinions, but the common thread that we've heard from them is, 'I feel appalled by what's unfolding. I truly desire to figure out a way to help,'" explains Rosenbaum.

"I think that there was an 'aha moment' for all of us as we started working on this, that this opened up an possibility to pivot from the ice-cream on the couch, wallowing in the gloom of everything that was happening around us, to having something productive to fully engage with."

One project that has secured funding through the effort is activities by the Alliance for International Medical Action to provide services encompassing nutritional rehabilitation, maternity services and crucial pediatric vaccinations in the West African nation.

It is crucial to keep such programmes going, explains the economist, not only because restarting operations if they ended would be extremely costly but also because of how much reliance would be forfeited in the war-torn regions if the alliance pulled out.

"Alima shared […] 'we're very worried that if we withdraw, we may never be invited back.'"

Initiatives with future-focused aims, such as strengthening health systems, or in other fields such as learning, have been excluded from the initiative's scope. It also does not aim to preserve programmes forever but to "create a window for the entities and, honestly, the larger network, to determine a sustainable answer".

After securing support for all projects on its original roster, the initiative states it will now prioritize helping additional individuals with "established, economical measures".