‘Total contradiction’: Tobacco giant lobbied against rules in Africa which are mandatory in UK

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting modifications of a draft bill that include lowering the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during broader worries about industry interference with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of industry lobbying globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to less than half “following international suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least 50% of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for multiple violations “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of the African subsidiary states the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and gather the crop and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, noting that underage people should be shielded from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, noting that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and tobacco industry, which encompasses growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.

Bruce Hernandez PhD
Bruce Hernandez PhD

A passionate writer and tech enthusiast sharing insights on digital trends and creative living.