🔗 Share this article

"I'll be positioned in the same seat by 2027," Sir Keir Starmer stated, adding that if the interview was successful, he might welcome the interviewer into his official residence for a follow-up conversation next year.

There is rarely ever break for leaders. In the hour before the interview began, Starmer had been on the phone with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky and working to decipher precisely had happened in Venezuela, where his close political chum, US President Donald Trump, had just targeted and seized its leader, Nicolás Maduro.

When the discussion, which was considerably lengthier than normal, had finished, Maduro had been formally accused in New York.

Renewed Energy for the New Year

With the new year begins, the Prime Minister appears to have had a kind of a revitalisation. Perhaps even just a bit of downtime with loved ones at Chequers, the prime minister's official country residence.

This seemed to have put him in a more positive mood than at the sluggish tail end of 2025, a terrible political year for him.

Yet, are he and his allies being unrealistic if they think his fortunes are poised to get better?

Internal Doubts

The harsh reality for the prime minister is that numerous of his party members believe he's not very good at his job. Some of them would rather take a risk and oust him in 2026.

However Starmer was rejecting the idea in the interview on Saturday morning.

Multiple times he told me he'd be "evaluated at the poll", arguing no one would take his five-year mandate from him – despite the fact that the most effective strategy of preventing Nigel Farage and Reform UK entering No 10 may be for Labour to switch its leader.

"We are in the fight of our generation and I plan to lead us," he affirmed.

The Spring Test

The problem for the PM is that he will be judged well ahead of then – in a mega set of elections in May across the UK. He attempted to protest, perhaps too much, that they are about who runs local authorities, and who runs the devolved administrations in Holyrood or Cardiff – and unrelated to Westminster.

Accurate – in part. But even though he may be reluctant to concede it, No 10 will be held accountable by those elections too.

Despite this, Sir Keir implying that there were no scenario under which he would walk away, even if a his MPs ran against him for the job, should those elections be catastrophic for Labour.

An Optimistic Outlook

He attempted to account for his low poll ratings by saying the public was naturally eager for things to change. He tried to assure me, and the public, that the coming months would be different.

The economy would strengthen despite rising unemployment, he argued, when plans the administration put in place during their first turbulent year began to take effect.

• He vowed to empty asylum hotels ahead of the current target date of 2029, although he did not set a specific date on that.
• He added too, with the proviso that it wasn't a foregone conclusion, that a peace agreement in Ukraine felt a greater possibility now than at any point since Russia's full-scale invasion.
• He disclosed for the first time that Western allies were now talking about how to integrate US and European forces to ensure security for Ukraine – to protect a potential peace.

His big point is that in 2026 the country will "turn the corner".

Familiar Arguments

The prime minister may have spoken with renewed vitality than observed from him for a some time – more relaxed, perhaps, with a longer slot to talk.

But despite encountering calls from various quarters for a bolder strategy, with much more political vision, more urgency, more speed and more immediacy, his points were well-known ones.

When he finds himself in considerable political peril, is a different approach required a new narrative?

No administration, and especially not one that has been struggling in the polls for many months, gets everything its own way.

The Prime Minister's problems are not just because governing is hard, but because he and his team have erred, including in the recent past.

Regrets and Risks

The prime minister admitted that he was sorry for saying he was "pleased" to see the return of the Egyptian-British activist Alaa Abd El Fattah to the UK following an controversy when comments he'd made in the past – including calls for Zionists and police to be killed – resurfaced.

Sir Keir attributed it to "the process" for not realising what the activist had said before – a more diplomatic way of saying it wasn't his responsibility.

And he is inviting evident political risks as the year progresses. His alliance with the US president acquires a new complication after Trump's military action on Venezuela.

Having interviewed Sir Keir Starmer, a ex- human rights lawyer who was against the war in Iraq, over his career, the idea he would be at ease with these events seems unlikely.

Policy Stances and Pressures

He stated he was a "lifelong champion of international law" but the public "just haven't got the full picture at the moment".

Opponents wanted him to criticise the action prior to we spoke. And the administration is likely to face more pressure to give an explicit view in Parliament in the coming days.

There has also consistently been growing pressure in the Labour party to revisit some of the consequences of Brexit.

The PM disputes he's pursuing that, but his new specific commitment to integrate further with the EU's single market – the vast economic European trading zone – will probably provoke accusations that he is breaking his pledge never to try to reverse the choices that followed Brexit.

A move to align with more of the single market will satisfy many on his side of the party, but it is simple material for Reform and the Conservatives to